ESRC seminar series:
CHALLENGES
FOR INFLECTIONAL DESCRIPTION
R45126450496: January 1997 -
December 1998
extended to June 1999
Description (from end of
award report)
This seminar
series involved the Universities of Brighton, Essex, London (School of Oriental
and African Studies - SOAS), Surrey and Sussex, with additional participants
(other than the guest speakers) from Cambridge, Cardiff Institute of HE,
Imperial College, Kentucky and University College London. Eight seminars were
held according to the proposal. We were opportunistic about our invitations and
the seminars were run under budget. We are grateful for the opportunity to run
a further two seminars, still well within the original budget. Of the total of
ten, three were held at Essex, three at
Outside speakers
Nine seminars involved an invited guest speaker:
|
speaker |
affiliation |
language discussed |
venue |
|
Prof. Keren Rice |
|
Slave (Athabaskan) |
|
|
Prof. Daniel Everett |
|
Pirahã |
|
|
Prof. Jean-Yves Urien & Prof. Gregory Stump |
University of Rennes & University of Kentucky, visiting |
Breton |
|
|
Prof. Nicholas Evans |
|
Mayali |
SOAS |
|
Prof. Marianne Mithun |
|
Mohawk and Yup’ik |
|
|
Prof. Alan Timberlake |
|
Lithuanian |
|
|
Prof. Bernard Comrie |
Max-Planck Institute, |
Tsez |
|
|
Prof. Martin Haspelmath |
Max-Planck Institute, |
Lezgian |
|
|
additional seminars |
|
|
|
|
no guest (see below) |
|
several lesser-used langs of |
|
|
Prof. Geert Booij |
Free University of |
Dutch |
|
Each guest led a
fruitful extended discussion on a pre‑circulated paper. In each case the
most challenging points of the inflectional system of the particular language
were presented by the guest and then analyzed together. This took the entire
morning. The ninth seminar was given over to minority languages of
Local participants
The afternoon of each seminar was given over to participants’ research, typically four papers, each consisting of a half-hour presentation with fifteen minutes discussion. Regular participants from each institution (including postgraduates writing theses on morphology) were invited to each seminar. Others were invited individually according to the particular seminar topic. Attendance varied only slightly: typically there were 15-18 present, with 5-6 postgraduates included.
Assessment
The series went
well, and exceeded our expectations. We fully met the aims and objectives
specified in the proposal. The guest speakers were stimulating and responsive
(a full morning’s discussion has not been a problem). The format of the
seminars worked very well. It provided a forum for established scholars to
report on current work, including interim results on four ESRC-funded projects
which were running at
While the guests
were invited to share their expertise, there was a useful return effect, in that
several commented favourably on the quality and
volume of work being carried out in this area in
However, it is more convincing to point to the outputs (return to web page for these).
Conclusion
We thus believe we have fully met the four aims and objectives specified. We are grateful to the ESRC for the opportunity to do so.
Report written by:
Professor Greville Corbett (
on behalf of the site organisers:
Professor Gerald Gazdar (
Professor Dick Hayward (SOAS)
Dr Andrew Spencer (