Council minutes publication framework

Having separately agreed in principle to publish Council minutes on the University website, it is appropriate to have an agreed policy on redaction. As defined by the National Archives “redaction is the separation of disclosable from non-disclosable information by blocking out individual words, sentences or paragraphs or the removal of whole pages or sections prior to the release of the document.”

It is important that key stakeholders are able to see evidence that Council is working effectively, and therefore redaction should be proportionate and reasonable. Minutes will be published only once they have been approved at the subsequent Council meeting.

Minutes will be redacted when:

1. Disclosure would go against the principles of GDPR and the Data Protection Act as they relate to individuals or identifiable groups

Typically, but not exclusively, this will include:

  1. i) reporting on any grievance or disciplinary committee at any stage in its proceedings;
  2. ii) reporting on any matter under police investigation, or any other enquiry which could lead to possible Court action;
  3. iii) reporting on the establishment of the redundancy committee and its conclusions, except in the event that its conclusions relate to a significant number of unnamed staff where the privacy of individuals can still be maintained; and
  4. iv) reporting on possible appointments, not yet confirmed and other matters affecting the personal affairs of individuals.

2. The item of business is commercial in confidence and disclosure would prejudice or would be likely to prejudice the University’s commercial interests.

This should be applied, for example, where:

  1. i) commercial negotiations with a third party are ongoing;
  2. ii) the university is in a legal dispute with a third party;
  3. iii) the matter relates to a regulatory issue that is to be concluded and it is not yet appropriate to place information in the public domain;
  4. iv) there is reasonable evidence that the third party expects the university to maintain confidentiality;
  5. v) full disclosure of the terms of a concluded deal could prejudice the university’s ability to strike subsequent deals of a similar nature;
  6. vi) there is sensitive operational information, including but not limited to pricing details received from contractors and suppliers.

3. A minute is critical of an individual not present at the meeting or otherwise prejudicial, and therefore not able to present an alternative perspective on the facts.

4. The matter would be redacted were the full Council approved minute to be the subject of a Freedom of Information request.

5. The minute covers other confidential matters not covered in 1 - 4 above.

Redaction should not be applied where the minute simply covers matters where the University has not performed as well as it might have hoped or planned.

Council recognises that it is conceivable that other, unanticipated, items could emerge, the publication of which would be considered seriously prejudicial to the University's interest. Under such circumstances, before determining the appropriate action, the Chair will seek the view of the Vice-Chancellor (and relevant colleagues). When making a decision, consideration of the exemptions and limitations that the FOI and Data Protection Act are subject to against the legitimate interests of the University, other organisations and individuals will be made. If redaction is applied, this will be reported to the next Council meeting.

Where items are redacted, at the end of the minute for publication, a note will be added to the effect that Council considered X other agenda items, which have been redacted in line with the Council's policy on redaction because they contain information relating to individuals or because they are still commercially confidential.