Dr Marie Newhouse

Research Interests

Kantian legal philosophy, legal obligation, theories of criminalization

Teaching

Criminal Law

Departmental Duties

Director, Surrey Centre for Law and Philosophy

Affiliations

UK Kant Society, North American Kant Society

Selected Media Appearances

BBC Breakfast, 8 February 2017 (discussing the 9th Circuit oral argument in the US litigation: Washington v Trump) Watch

BBC News, 10 February 2017 (discussing the 9th Circuit opinion in the US litigation: Washington v Trump)

BBC World News, 10 February 2017 (discussing the 9th Circuit opinion in the US litigation: Washington v Trump)

Contact Me

E-mail:
Phone: 01483 68 6330

Find me on campus
Room: 32 AB 05


My office hours

Tuesdays: 9:30 - 10:45 

Wednesdays: 11:15 - 13:15

Publications

Journal articles

  • Newhouse M . (2016) 'Two Types of Legal Wrongdoing'. Cambridge University Press Legal Theory, 22 (1), pp. 59-75.

    Abstract

    There are two distinct types of legal wrongdoing: civil and criminal. This article demonstrates in three ways that Immanuel Kant’s Universal Principle of Right, properly interpreted, offers a plausible and resilient account of this important distinction. First, Kant’s principle correctly identifies attempted crimes as crimes themselves even when they do not violate the rights of any individual. Second, it justifies our treatment of reckless endangerment as a crime by distinguishing it from ordinary negligence, which traditionally is only civilly wrong. Third, it justifies differences between the way in which we determine criminal punishments and the way in which we measure civil remedies. Moreover, the Universal Principle of Right yields a Kantian standard for criminal wrongdoing that is compelling enough to inform future philosophical inquiries into the nature and limits of the state’s criminal lawmaking authority.

  • Newhouse ME. (2014) 'Institutional Corruption: A Fiduciary Theory'. Cornell University Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy, United States of America: 23 (3), pp. 553-594.

    Abstract

    Dennis F. Thompson developed a theory of “institutional corruption” in order to explain a phenomenon that he believed the Congressional ethics rules failed to address: Congress’ systematic deviation from its proper purpose as a consequence — not merely of individual wrongdoing — but of the influence of several general systemic features of the legislative process. Researchers at Harvard University’s Edmond J. Safra Center for Ethics have recently deployed the language of institutional corruption broadly in analyses of various other public and private institutions, such as regulatory agencies, banks, pharmaceutical companies, and think tanks. The states of affairs that researchers have identified as “institutional corruption” fall into four categories: 1) breaches of fiduciary duty, 2) fraud or otherwise unfair commercial practices, 3) destructive firm behavior, and 4) mistake, inefficiency, or incompetence. This Article reveals that only the first of these represents a true application of Dennis F. Thompson’s theory of institutional corruption, which was originally developed in the context of Congressional ethics. Research projects that deploy the terminology of institutional corruption in non-fiduciary contexts are certainly valuable, but they do not address the subject matter of institutional corruption, properly understood.

  • Gryphon M. (2011) 'The Better Part of Lenity'. The Journal of Law, Economics & Policy, United States of America: 7 (4), pp. 717-724.
  • Gryphon M. (2011) 'Assessing the Effects of a "Loser Pays" Rule on the American Legal System: An Economic Analysis and Proposal for Reform'. Rutgers Journal of Law & Public Policy Rutgers Journal of Law and Public Policy, United States of America: 8 (3), pp. 567-613.

Theses and dissertations

  • Newhouse ME. (2013) Kant's Typo, and the Limits of the Law. Harvard University

Page Owner: mn0015
Page Created: Tuesday 2 September 2014 16:25:48 by pj0010
Last Modified: Tuesday 26 September 2017 12:49:34 by mn0015
Expiry Date: Wednesday 2 December 2015 16:24:37
Assembly date: Fri Dec 15 00:35:33 GMT 2017
Content ID: 131268
Revision: 9
Community: 1169

Rhythmyx folder: //Sites/surrey.ac.uk/School of Law/people
Content type: rx:StaffProfile