Commentary: IPCC funding deadlock risks undermining climate preparedness
Following countries’ failure to approve the IPCC’s budget amid a dispute over the publication timetable for its next climate assessments, as reported by the Financial Times (27/10/26), Dr Nicole Cocolas, Senior Lecturer in Transport Management at the University of Surrey, argues the situation demonstrates on full display the political nature of climate science.
“The entanglements of climate science and politics is well researched and on full display here. The IPCC plays an integral role in informing governments, businesses and individuals about changes to the climate, helping them understand the risks and plan ahead.
“What concerns me most is the suggestion that these reports should be delayed under the guise of benefiting developing nations, despite a lack of evidence to support this argument.
“The FT article implies that a small number of fossil fuel-dependent governments are seeking to influence the timing of international scientific assessments to serve national interests. Yet delaying the evidence that informs a transition away from fossil fuels does little to prepare those countries for their own futures.
“No science is neutral, but the situation with the IPCC demonstrates the importance of impartial oversight and the need to minimise the politicization of climate science. The priority should be ensuring that the reports are rigorous, inclusive and available when they are needed.”
Media Contacts
External Communications and PR team
Phone: +44 (0)1483 684380 / 688914 / 684378
Email: mediarelations@surrey.ac.uk
Out of hours: +44 (0)7773 479911