Dr Lewis Doyle

Pronouns: he/him


Lecturer in Social Psychology
PhD in Psychology, University of Sussex
19AC05: Tuesdays 2-4pm

Academic and research departments

School of Psychology.

About

My qualifications

PhD in Psychology at the University of Sussex.
MSc in Experimental Psychology at the University of Sussex
BA(Hons) in Primary Education and Initial Teacher Training at the University of the West of England

News

In the media

Do schools need to change course on behaviour?

Interviewee
TES

Bias in Preschool: Teachers Are Less Likely to Call on Working-Class Children

Author
SPSP Character & Context Blog

Dealing with our unconscious biases

Guest
Obsessed with Assessment (podcast)
2025

The Benefits of Making Students Feel Heard and Valued

Author
SPSP Character & Context Blog

Research

Research interests

Teaching

Publications

Highlights

Doyle, L., Cimpian, A., Goupil, L., & Goudeau, S. (2025). Preschool teachers provide fewer participation opportunities to working-class students than those from more privileged backgrounds. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 122(36), e2515833122. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2515833122

 

Doyle, L., Nash, R. A., Jakcsiova, V., & Turner, E. (2025). ‘They want you to read their work’: Teachers’ and students’ perspectives on the use of AI for school feedback. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-025-09903-0

 

Doyle, L., Tropp, L. R., & Easterbrook, M. J. (2025). Examining How White Teachers’ Interracial Contact Experiences Shape Their Self-Efficacy and School Choices. Educational Researcher, 54(5), 247-257. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X251322791

 

Doyle, L., Harris, P. R., & Easterbrook, M. J. (2025). An empathy intervention reduces the gender gap in school discipline and facilitates belonging. European Journal of Social Psychology, 55(2), 327-341. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.3146

 

Easterbrook, M. J., Doyle, L., & Talbot, D. (2025). Using social psychology to create inclusive education. British Journal of Social Psychology, 64, e12867. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12867 

 

Hadden, I. R., Darnon, C., Doyle, L., Easterbrook, M. J., Goudeau, S., & Cimpian, A. (2025). Why the belief in meritocracy is so pervasive. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 29(2), 101-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2024.12.008

 

Doyle, L., & Easterbrook, M. J. (2024). Biased career choices? It depends what you believe: Trainee teachers’ aversions to working in low-income schools are moderated by beliefs about inequality, meritocracy, and growth mindsets. Journal of Social Issues, 80, 1262–1288. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12648 

 

Doyle, L., Easterbrook, M. J., & Tropp, L. R. (2024). Who you know influences where you go: Intergroup contact attenuates bias in trainee teachers' school preferences. British Journal of Social Psychology 63(3), 1497-1514. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12738

 

Doyle, L., Harris, P. R., & Easterbrook, M. J. (2024). Quality and quantity: How contexts influence the emergence of teacher bias. Social Psychology of Education, 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-023-09882-z

 

Doyle, L., Easterbrook, M. J., & Harris, P. R. (2023). It’s a problem, but not mine: Exploring bias-related message acceptance among teachers. Social Psychology of Education, 27. 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-023-09832-9

 

Doyle, L., Easterbrook, M. J., & Harris, P. R. (2023). Roles of socioeconomic status, ethnicity and teacher beliefs in academic grading. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 00, 1– 22. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12541

 

Easterbrook, M. J., Doyle, L., Grozev, V. H., Kosakowska-Berezecka, N., Harris, P. R., & Phalet, K. (2023). Socioeconomic and gender inequalities in home learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: examining the roles of the home environment, parent supervision, and educational provisions. Educational and Developmental Psychologist, 40(1), 27-39. https://doi.org/10.1080/20590776.2021.2014281

Lewis Doyle, Andrei Cimpian, Louise Goupil, Sébastien Goudeau (2025)Preschool teachers provide fewer participation opportunities to working-class students than those from more privileged backgrounds, In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS122(36)e2515833122 National Academy of Sciences

Social class disparities exist from the earliest stages of education. Research has suggested that class-based differences in factors such as socialization practices and access to resources partly explain this phenomenon, but less work has explored whether teachers’ practices also exacerbate these inequalities. Using whole-class observations of 63 preschool classroom discussions (N = 226 students, 10 teachers), we coded 7,941 student participation attempts and subsequent responses from teachers. Mixed-effects Bayesian logistic regressions showed that whether students played by the rules by raising their hands or broke the rules by calling out, they were less likely to have their participation attempts accepted if they came from a working-class background, even when their perceived language skills were matched to their middle- and upper-class peers. These results suggest that early schooling experiences may serve to exacerbate inequalities rather than level the playing field.

Lewis Doyle, Robert A. Nash, Viktoria Jakcsiova, Ellen Turner (2025)'They want You to Read Their Work': Teachers' and Students' Perspectives on the Use of AI for School Feedback, In: Technology, knowledge and learning30(4)pp. 1917-1941 Springer Nature

Providing feedback is time-consuming for teachers, but new Artificial Intelligence tools aim to reduce this burden and improve feedback quality. We asked teachers (N = 12) to trial an AI tool for providing feedback on students' work. In semi-structured interviews they reflected on the positive and negative implications of such tools. In focus groups, secondary school students (N = 9) also shared their views on the use of AI feedback tools. Results showed that teachers believed AI tools could save time and reduce subjectivity in the feedback process. However, they also shared concerns about these tools' potential impact on teacher-student relationships, their ability to meet individual students' needs, and a potential deskilling of the teaching workforce. Many of these views were largely echoed by students in our sample. We conclude that AI tools for feedback are promising but need further development, and should include teachers' and students' voices as key to this work.