Dr Emily Finch


Associate Professor (Reader) in Law
LLB, LLM, PhD, SFHEA

Academic and research departments

Surrey Law School.

About

Areas of specialism

Criminal Law; Legal Skills and Legal Education; Cybercrime; Empirical research methods

University roles and responsibilities

  • OSCAR Panel Chair
  • Member of the University Ethics Committee
  • Academic Quality Panel Member

    My qualifications

    2000
    PhD: ‘The Criminalisation of Stalking: Construction of the Problem and Evaluation of the Solution’
    University of Wales, Aberystwyth
    2025
    Senior Fellow of the Higher Education Academy (SFHEA)
    Advance HE

    Affiliations and memberships

    Senior Fellow of the Higher Education Academy
    Senior Fellowship recognises experienced higher education professionals with a sustained record of effective and inclusive practice who lead or influence learning and teaching beyond their own classrooms.

    Senior Fellows play a significant role in enhancing the quality of teaching and learning for others - through leadership, mentoring, curriculum development, or strategic influence - and make a demonstrable contribution at institutional or sector level that extends beyond direct teaching or learner support.

    News

    In the media

    Research

    Research interests

    Conference papers

    2026

    20 May 2026, 'Conversations that Count: Exploring the Development of the World Café as a Research Method', British Academy/The Wolfson Foundation, London

    18 March 2026, 'Stories of Survival: From Silence to Strength', Enhancing Research Culture through Public Engagement, University of Surrey

    4 March 2026, 'Student Solutions to Student Problems: Using the World Café to Engage with Students', Leeds Law School Seminar Series, Online

    5 February 2026, 'The Impact of Excluding Family Law from the SQE: Implications for Legal Education and Practice', CHULS Pracademia Project, Online

    2025

    9 December 2025, ‘Sound Off and Sort It Out: Embedding Student Voice in Institutional Improvement Using the World Cafe’, Advance HE Educational Excellence Symposium, Online

    26 November 2025, ‘Public Perceptions of Domestic Abuse and Their Influence on Jury Decision-Making in Homicide Trials’, Gendered Violence Conference, London

    4 November 2025, ‘Why Don’t They Just Do It? Reimagining Formative Assessment Through Student Co-Creation’, Advance HE Assessment and Feedback Symposium, Online

    10 October 2025, ‘Creating “Safe Enough” Spaces for Research: Using the World Café to Research Perceptions of Domestic Abuse Homicide’, Researching Sensitive Topics, Online

    1 September 2025, ‘Public Perceptions of Domestic Abuse and their Influence on Jury Decision-Making in Homicide Trials’, SLS Conference, University of Leeds

    2 July 2025, ‘Using the World Café as a Method of Criminological Research’, BSC Conference, University of Portsmouth

    14 May 2025, ‘The Formative Menu and the Feedback Buffet: Student Solutions to the Problems of Formative Assessment’, Learning and Teaching Showcase, University of Surrey

    2024

    18 October 2024, ‘Promoting the World Café as a Method of Generating Data in Crime and Justice Research’, British Academy Networking Event, London

    4 September 2024, ‘Working with Students to Enrich Legal Education using the World Café Method’, SLS Conference, University of Bristol

    20 June 2024, ‘Understanding and Overcoming the Challenges of Formative Assessment’, Connecting Legal Education, University of Leeds

    Supervision

    Postgraduate research supervision

    Completed postgraduate research projects I have supervised

    Teaching

    Publications

    Highlights

    Legal Skills (10th edn, OUP 2025)

    A widely adopted undergraduate text supporting the development of core competencies for law students across the UK. Now in its 10th edition, with around 100,000 copies sold, the book is recognised for its practical guidance on legal research, writing, problem-solving, advocacy, negotiation and professional ethics. Designed to support students from their first year through to final assessments, it has become a foundational resource in legal education.

    https://global.oup.com/ukhe/product/legal-skills-9780198924722

     

    Emily Finch (2025) 'What is dishonesty and who decides?'

    Chapter 1 in Sotirios Santatzoglou, Martin Wasik, Anthony Wrigley (eds.) 'Dishonesty, Liability and the Law: Exploring the Moral Importance of Context' (Routledge, 2025)

    Despite its serious consequences in criminal and professional contexts, the law provides little clear guidance on how dishonesty should be defined or determined. This chapter draws on empirical research into public perceptions of dishonesty to highlight the lack of a shared understanding and argues for a clearer, more accessible legal definition to support principled and consistent decision-making.
     

    Emily Finch (2022) 'Psychological Injury: Where’s the Harm in It?'

    [2022] 5 Criminal Law Review 358-378

    We live in a world in which we are urged to #bekind and where there has never been greater awareness of the impact of cruel behaviour on an individual's mental wellbeing. As such, it seems unfathomable that the criminal law only concerns itself with damage to a person's state of mind if it falls into a narrow, arbitrary and artificial clinically-defined category. This article argues that this restrictive interpretation of preceding authorities in Dhaliwal was wrong and a more expansive approach would strengthen the law and create much-needed parity between physical and non-physical harm.
     

    Emily Finch (2021) 'The Elephant in the (Jury) Room: Exploring Jurors Understanding of Different Approaches to Dishonesty'

    [2021] 7 Criminal Law Review 513-531

    Many words have been written in the debate about the correct stance on dishonesty in criminal law. The long-standing Ghosh test was much criticised but is the new approach formulated in Ivey an improvement or does it simply create a different problem? This article explores this question from the perspective of the practical workability of the tests in the courtroom by using data from a mock trial to assess the extent to which mock jurors were able to understand and apply four different approaches to dishonesty.
     

    Emily Finch (2026) Case commentary: R v Shiel [2026] 8 Crim LR 523-526

    Comments on R v Shiel (Michael) (CA) on whether the trial judge had erred in admitting, as part of the res gestae, evidence of two oral statements made by the appellant's partner in circumstances where what she had said in those statements included a demonstrable lie about the whereabouts of her baby when the assault took place.

    Emily Finch (2026) Case commentary: R v Giscombe [2026] 7 Criminal Law Review 440-444

    Comments on R v Giscombe (Frazer) (CA), an appeal against convictions for rape, on the ground that one of the complainants gave evidence, in the form of a recorded ABE interview and live cross-examination, without being sworn in.

    Emily Finch (2026) Case commentary: R v BCZ [2026] 4 Crim LR 230-236

    Comments on R v BCZ (CA) on whether wilfulness, for the purpose of child cruelty contrary to the Children and Young Persons Act 1933 s.1, related to the act only, or also the likelihood of consequential harm, the form of mens rea and the applicability of an objective element of recklessness.

    Emily Finch (2026) Case commentary: R v Baniultye [2026] 3 Crim LR 161-165

    Comments on R v Baniulyte (Lurdita) (CA) where the court provided guidance on the approach to be taken when an accused person, who was or might be a victim of modern slavery and human trafficking, appealed against their conviction for drug offences and requested anonymisation.