Cathy Derham

Cathrine Derham

Associate Dean (Learning and Teaching) FHMS. Senior Teaching Fellow. School of Health Sciences
BA (Hons) Sociology; MSc Social Research; PGDip Professional Education; RGN, ENB 100, 870 & 998 Senior Fellow HEA
+44 (0)1483 682155
09 DK 04
9am - 5.30pm, by appointment only.
Personal assistant: Carolina Garcia Ochoa
+44 (0)1483 688510


University roles and responsibilities

  • Associate Dean (Learning and Teaching) FHMS
  • Chair - Faculty Learning and Teaching Committee
  • Member of The University Learning and Teaching Committee and Senate
  • Member of University strategic working group - Teaching Quality and Valuing Teaching
  • Chair - School of Health Sciences DBS Scrutiny Panel
  • Member of Recognising Quality in Learning and Education (RQLE) team - School of Health Sciences.
  • Module Leader - Innovations and Leadership
  • External Examiner - The University of Manchester

My qualifications

BA (Hons) Sociology
Goldsmiths College, University of London
MSc. Social Research
University of Surrey
PG Diploma in Professional Education (NMC registered)
Oxford Brookes University
Registered General Nurse
St. Mary’s Hospital. London W2

Affiliations and memberships

Nursing and Midwifery Council
Registered Nurse
Royal College of Nursing,


Research interests

Research projects

My teaching

Courses I teach on


My publications


Sookhoo, D. Pellowe, C. Derham, C (2013). The experiences and health outcomes of patients with heart failure following their participation in self management education programmes

JBI Database of Systematic Reviews & Implementation Reports JBL000165 2013; 11 (2) 236-280
View abstract
Patients with heart failure  benefit from self-management educational programmes. Most research reports tend to adopt a quantitative approach and report on outcome measures such as quality of life and symptom management.  The objective of this review was to synthesise the evidence related to the experiences of people who participated in the self-management patient education programmes and the impact upon their subsequent health maintenance. Eight studies were included in the review. Forty-seven findings were extracted and grouped into seven categories. These were synthesised into two  findings: the motivation to attend self-care programmes and adopt health behaviours; the experience of greater confidence and control over heart failure through participation in group programmes with supportive healthcare professionals. Self-management programmes were useful in building confidence to manage the condition  Patient self-management was enhanced when programmes were provided by supportive staff, augmenting patients' understanding and motivation to change their eating habits, take regular exercise and manage and monitor their symptoms.  
Derham, C. (2007). Achieving Comprehensive Critical Care.

Nursing in Critical Care. 12 (3) 124 – 131
View abstract
The policy document, Comprehensive Critical Care, suggested that patients with critical care needs should expect the same standard of care wherever they are nursed, be that in a traditional critical care setting or in a general ward area. It is recognized that in order for this to occur, the developmental needs of ward nurses need to be met to enable them to care for patients with level 1 and level 2 needs. A second document, The Nursing Contribution to the Provision of Comprehensive Critical Care for Adults: A strategic Programme of Action, proposed a programme of action and outlined five priority areas to be considered to ensure the success of comprehensive critical care. Education, training and workforce development was one of the areas outlined, and thus, in response, the role of the practice development facilitator was created as a means of developing the critical care knowledge, skills and practice in ward areas. It became apparent that education and training alone were insufficient to ensure that the aims of comprehensive critical care were realized. The way in which the nurses approached and organized their work and the availability of resources had a great impact on the ability of staff to care for these patients. It is argued that achieving comprehensive critical care is complex and that a multi-dimensional approach to the implementation of policy is essential in order to realize its aims.
Derham, C. Hodge, D. Holley, F (2016). The Quality of Mentors Written feedback and use of the ongoing achievement record following the introduction of grading in practice.
View abstract
The aim of any assessment strategy is to enable development. Effective feedback should serve to summarise activities and achievements, in addition to highlighting issues related to future practice (Maton 2012, Jenkins 2010).  This is the  purpose of the ongoing achievement record (NMC 2008) and thus there is an expectation that comments made by mentors,  should both state attainment and feed forward to  identify what needs to be developed and how this might be achieved. Although there is evidence that students are critical of mentors who provide feedback that is not developmental (Clynes and Rafferty 2008, Duffy 2004), very little is known about the nature or quality of written feedback and the effectiveness of the on-going achievement record as a tool to enable development. This work  examines the quality of mentor feedback documented in the on-going achievement record. A quantitative analysis of feedback was completed using 22 students’ practice assessment documents from across the fields of nursing practice. Mentors’ feedback was classified using a scoring system with criteria ranging from ‘personal opinion’ to ’informative developmental guidance’. Findings from the analysis of data indicate that the majority of mentor feedback is descriptive, with reference made to students’ personal characteristics or simply stating what has been achieved. There is little evidence of developmental feedback, even in the case of the failing student. The findings from the study raise significant concerns about the nature and quality of written feedback and the use of the on-going achievement record.  It is argued that the ongoing achievement record is not being utilised effectively as results indicate that mentor feedback does not enable progression and on-going learning. 
Derham, C (2016). Creating a Bachelor of Nursing Curriculum: Lessons from a best practice provider.
View abstract
An invited speaker asked to share experiences of being involved in the development of a nursing curriculum,  which had lead to an overall improvement in the student experience and satisfaction. Whilst it is important to consider innovative practices and ideas, it is the context in which the curriculum is based  which is vital in ensuring success. The interdependence between the organisational culture, leadership and the environment needs to considered when developing a curriculum. This includes sharing  educational values and being supported by strong visionary leadership which enables critical reflection, motivates  and rewards people for developing a  different educational experience for students.  The environment most likely to foster innovation is one that encourages collaborative approaches across disciplines , with students acting as co-producers, service users and practice colleagues. Determination and resilience are vital in order to keep programmes contemporary.
Hollings, S. Derham, C (2013). Life after Intensive Care: The care giver’s experience.
View abstract
There is a fundamental link between patient recovery and family wellbeing. Increasing numbers of patients are benefiting from treatment in intensive care, who return home to be cared for by their families and other care givers. Recognising the caregivers’ needs is essential in order to safeguard the family unit, provide holistic care and ensure effective patient rehabilitation. Caregivers provide a crucial role in this, but face many challenges. There is little research related to the family experience after intensive care, but evidence suggests they go through a wide range of both positive and negative events and emotions. A literature review was completed to investigate original research into the caregiver experience at home. The findings identified a  new syndrome, Post Intensive Care Syndrome – Family which suggests caregivers experience psychological problems after a patient is discharged from hospital. The caregiver experience at home is more complex than suggested by PICS-F and that the syndrome should be widened. The impact upon caregivers can be both positive and negative affecting psychological and physical wellbeing, family dynamics, friendships, and lifestyles. Post ICU caregivers are a largely unrecognised group and receive limited, if any support after hospital discharge. Therefore family members need open-ended support beyond the hospital stay and there is potential to redefine the interpretation of critical care without walls. ICU teams need to move beyond ‘silo thinking’ to embrace a more multidisciplinary approach to care after discharge.    
Bettles, S. Derham, C. Morley, D. (2018). Exploration of students’ learning gain following immersive simulation – making feedback count.
The Society in Europe For Simulation Applied To Medicine. 24th Annual Meeting, Bilbao.
View abstract
An under developed aspect of the use of simulation is understanding of how students use formative feedback, or ‘the debrief’, to feedforward into their own professional practice. 120 third year student nurses undertook an immersive simulated experience prior to their final placement before registration. Using a mixed method approach we explored students’ perception of their learning, how the debrief was used and ways in which students could more effectively transfer the learning gained during simulation into real like practice. Results highlighted the requirement for two different and interdependent feedback strategies, These were important for students as they enabled them to capitalise on their immediate learning during the simulation, as well as being able to take their learning into future practice. The first feedback, ‘the debrief’, was categorised by students as specific, immediate and personalised. The reactive nature of the feedback was enhanced using all players in the simulation; staff, actors and the students themselves. The second phase of the feedback required students to re-contextualise their experience and feedback to the workplace and write an relevant action plan to guide their practice. Data indicated that the potential to build upon the simulation debrief was diluted by a number of factors: students’ difficulty in deconstructing meaningful feedback; their concealment of areas for improvement from their practice supervisors; and their lack of awareness of the importance of feedforward to their long-term development.
Morley, D. Derham, C. Bettles, S. (2018). The exploration of students’ learning gain following immersive simulation – the impact of feedback. Teaching in the spotlight: Learning from global communities, AdvanceHE
View abstract
Simulation has become a pedagogy integral to the professional preparation of students for real world settings. A literature review demonstrates its impact in the developed world where countries such as the UK, Australia and the USA invest time and resource in the development of sophisticated simulation suites for their students. A mixed method study analysed the sustainability of this model for pre-registration nursing preparation for practice. In particular, the study findings focus on the ability of students to transfer their learning from simulation to real life practice. Findings highlighted the success of a two- stage feedback approach to students’ learning. The first allowed immediate interactive dialogue with students’ about  their simulation experience.  The second, crucially often missed as part of students’ development, examined how feedback could be successfully transferred into a professional developmental discussion with clinical staff in a different setting away from the original simulation. Difficulties bridging the recognised theory – practice gap in nursing (Evans et al 2010) were identified. Findings align with the move to sustainable feedback skills in higher education as part of students’ development both in the academic and practice settings.
Derham, C. Bettles, S. Morley, D. (2018). Immersive Simulated Practice. What is the learning gain for students?
NET18 Conference, AdvanceHE
View abstract
An under developed aspect of this pedagogic approach is understanding  how students use the insights and knowledge gained during the experience and formative feedback process,  to feedforward into their own professional practice. The transfer and recontextualisation of knowledge and learning from one setting to another is vital in order to achieve learning gain. Learning gain is recognised as the development in knowledge, skills, work-readiness and personal development made by students (HEFCE 2017). In order to maximise the impact of immersive simulation and formative feedback it is important to recognise the challenges associated with the transfer of learning from one setting to another and workplace recontextualisation. Using a mixed method approach we  investigated students’ perception of their learning; how the debrief was used to give formative feedback; and strategies students used to transferred their learning into clinical practice. Findings from an evaluation questionnaire highlighted the success of the event overall. Issues were raised within focus groups concerning the formative feedback process, which took place immediately after the simulation activity as a form of interactive dialogue between students and the facilitator. Challenges associated with how learning and feedback could be successfully transferred into the workplace were identified and strategies to address the barriers which impact upon workplace and learner recontextualisation were identified. It is important that these are understood and addressed in order to ensure the subsequent development of the learner and to optimise the learning gain associate with this pedagogic approach.
Derham, C. (2018). Nursing. In I. M. Kinchin & N. E. Winstone (Eds.), Exploring pedagogic frailty and resilience: Case studies of academic narrative (pp. 61-75). Leiden: Brill/Sense. (in press).