Integrity and governance

The University of Surrey is proud to undertake excellent research to the highest level of integrity and ethical responsibility, working closely with its students, businesses, government and civil society to transition knowledge to the benefit of humanity.  

Every member of the University is expected to act with integrity in their work, and this is endorsed in the Code on Good Research Practice and Ethics Handbook for Teaching and Research which provide a guide for all research throughout the University. 

View all our research-related policies on the University of Surrey's policies page, including: 

Concordat to support research integrity

We are committed to delivering the principles set out in the Concordat to support research integrity, launched in 2012. As part of this commitment, the University maintains an action plan highlighting where improvements to existing process and training could be made.  As part of our commitment to the Concordat, the University shares its latest Annual Integrity Statement 2016/17 (PDF).

The Associate Deans (Research) and Director of the Doctoral College may be contacted with any issue related to research integrity, or to report a concern of research misconduct. 

The Associate Deans (Research) are supported by the Research Integrity and Governance Committee, chaired by Professor Vince Emery and the Research Integrity and Governance Office (RIGO).

Research Integrity and Governance Office (RIGO)

Research Integrity and Governance Office (RIGO)
Research and Innovation Services
Senate House
Guildford, Surrey
GU2 7XH

Phone: +44 (0) 1483 68 9110
Fax: +44 (0) 1483 68 3791
Email: rigo@surrey.ac.uk (including external sponsorship approvals)
Ethics: ethics@surrey.ac.uk

The University of Surrey resolves to be a place where research is carried out at to the highest standards and is fully supportive of the Concordat to support research integrity.

We resolve to be an honest and ethical institution in the way we conduct our business and discharge our responsibilities.

The University aims to promote and support an organisational culture in which high standards of personal and professional conduct in teaching and research are expected and achieved.

To that end, the University will oppose academic misconduct and will take appropriate and robust action in instances where misconduct or fraud is discovered.

Research misconduct is such a serious matter, those responsible for staff and postgraduate research students conducting research have a particular duty to ensure that those new to research or to the University receive appropriate training in the ethical, legal and other conventions concerning the conduct of research.

The University seeks to sustain this approach by providing a research environment that fosters and supports honesty in research, and also discourages unacceptable behaviour, by dealing seriously and sensitively with all allegations of misconduct in research.

It is a condition of conducting research under the auspices of the University that practice conforms to the University’s Code on Good Research Practice.

Our Code of Practice on Handling Allegations of Research Misconduct describes Surrey's approach to identifying and managing misconduct.

What is misconduct? 

Academic misconduct is defined as any breach of the University’s Code of Good Research Practice, or other practices that seriously deviate from those that are commonly accepted within the research communities for proposing, conducting and/or reporting research.

It specifically encompasses, but is not restricted to:

  • Plagiarism – misrepresentation of the work, ideas and or concepts of others as one’s own without permission or acknowledgement
  • Fabrication and/or misappropriation of data, including the creation of false data or other aspects of research, including documentation and participant consent
  • Falsification including the inappropriate manipulation and/or selection of data, imagery and/or consents
  • Misrepresentation of interests and/or data and/or involvement regarding, for example, qualifications and/or authorship
  • Intentional mismanagement or inadequate preservation of data and/or primary materials
  • Cheating or otherwise disclosing information with the intent of gaining for oneself or for another an unfair advantage
  • Intentional damage to, or removal of, the research-related property of another
  • Intentional non-compliance with the terms and conditions governing the award of external funding for research or with the University’s policies and procedures relating to research, including ethical conditions governing research involving animal and human participants, health and safety regulations, human tissue and personal data

Misconduct in research would not normally include professional/academic differences in interpretation or judgment of data.

For the avoidance of doubt, misconduct in research includes acts of omission as well as acts of commission.

In addition, the standards by which allegations of misconduct in research should be judged should be those prevailing at the date that the behaviour under investigation took place.

How do I report a concern or suspicion that misconduct is taking place?

Allegations of academic misconduct concerning the actions of a member of staff of the University must be reported to an Associate Dean for Research.

Such allegations can be reported to any Associate Dean for Research, not necessarily of a particular faculty.

Allegations of misconduct regarding the actions of a postgraduate student must be reported to the Director of the Doctoral College.

In making an allegation of academic misconduct, please complete a written report detailing the nature of the suspected misconduct. The report should be made using the standard pro-forma (Word).

It is expected that, in normal circumstances, the individual reporting the suspected academic misconduct would be willing to be named and provide evidence.

However, where an individual has reservations about reporting suspected academic misconduct directly, they may opt to do so through the head of department or line manager. 

If the individual wishing to make the allegation is a postgraduate research student, then they may opt to report their suspicion through their supervisor, postgraduate research director or the Students’ Union.

The University of Surrey is a subscriber to the United Kingdom’s Research Integrity Office (UKRIO). UKRIO is an independent charity, offering support to the public, researchers and organisations to further good practice in academic, scientific and medical research. Visit the UKRIO website for more information.

If you would like to discuss or seek advice on research misconduct, please email RIGO.

Vice-Provost, Research and Innovation

The Vice-Provost, Research and Innovation, VP(R&I), is responsible for leading the University’s research strategy and performance, providing leadership to the Universities REF (Research Excellence Framework) submission and ambition to maximise income through grant awards and outcomes through impact and knowledge transfer activities.

Associate Deans for Research

To support the Vice-President, Research and Innovation, each faculty has an appointed Associate Dean for Research (ADR), aligning the University and faculty approaches.

University Research and Innovation Committee

To drive research strategy forward, the University is facilitated by the University Research and Innovation Committee (URI) chaired by the Vice-Provost, Research and Innovation.

The Research and Innovation Committee has oversight of research strategies and policies and reviews the University’s performance against its research aims and objectives.  The Committee considers external and internal factors that will enhance or limit the University’s ability to deliver high quality research.

URIC is supported by three sub-committees:

  • Research Integrity and Governance Committee
    To ensure that research activity at the University of Surrey is carried out to the highest standards of rigour and integrity; and to provide strategic direction on the development, implementation and evaluation of the concordat to support research integrity. 
  • Doctoral College Board
    The Doctoral College Board is responsible for formulating policy and strategy that will support the Doctoral College in meeting its objectives. The Doctoral College Board will oversee key aspects of the postgraduate researcher and early career researcher experience with a particular focus on building a cohesive community and research environment, providing first class training, facilitating excellent supervision, and enhancing employability skills.  
  • Research Management Committee
    Will ensure that the policies, strategies and sub-strategies introduced by the University’s Research and Innovation Committee are implemented. The Committee will also advice the University’s Research and Innovation Committee on emerging strategic or operational issues, performance and propose ways to enhance the quality and reputation of research.